96 | 0 | 100 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 评价在疾病诊断分组(DRG)支付背景下多模态管理对肠外营养(PN)合理用药的管控效果。方法 2023年7月1日,医院多部门联动,以DRG病组超支病例用药分析为切入点,实施多模式、多系统、动态跟踪的多模态管理方式,对使用PN治疗的患者进行综合管理,具体措施包括分析DRG超支病例的药物利用数据、采用PN药物计算机处方订单输入(CPOE)系统对不合理用药问题进行干预和建立PN药物动态点评和反馈机制。收集2022年7月1日至2024年6月30日使用PN治疗的胃肠道大手术病组(GB病组)病例共217例,其中干预前(2022年7月1日至2023年6月30日)130例,干预后(2023年7月1日至2024年6月30日)87例。对干预前后PN药物使用的合理性和GB病组的药物相关经济学指标进行评价。结果 多模态管理干预后,PN静脉输液率从3.98%下降到3.00%;PN医嘱的整体不合理率和重点监控药物复方氨基酸注射液(18AA-IX)的医嘱不合理率较干预前均显著下降(P<0.01);GB病组医疗总费用、药占比和西药费用均显著下降(P<0.05)。结论 通过多模态管理,GB病组的PN药物合理用药水平显著提高,医疗费用结构得到了优化。
Abstract:AIM To assess the impact of multimodal management on rational use of parenteral nutrition(PN) underthe diagnosis related groups(DRGs) payment system. METHODS A hospital-wide multidisciplinary cooperation, centeredaround the analysis of medication use in overspent cases of DRG disease groups, was carried out for patients undergoinggastrointestinal major surgery who received PN therapy. On August 1, 2023, the cross-departmental quality-enhancingproject was initiated. It adopted a comprehensive management model featuring multimodal control systems and real-timemonitoring mechanisms for PN administration. The intervention plan consisted of regulating the drug utilization data ofoverspent cases in the gastrointestinal major surgery group, creating an intelligent computerized physician order entry(CPOE) system for PN to detect and correct irrational prescriptions, and setting up a dynamic medication assessment andfeedback mechanism to continuously optimize the system. A total of 217 patients undergoing gastrointestinal major surgery(GB group) and receiving PN therapy from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2024, were gathered. Among them, 130 patients werein the pre-intervention period(from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023), and 87 patients were in the post-intervention period(from July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024). Comparative assessments of PN utilization appropriateness and pharmacoeconomicperformance metrics within the GB group were systematically conducted during pre-and post-intervention phases.RESULTS Post-intervention, the utilization rate of PN intravenous infusions across the hospital was reduced from 3.09%to 3.00%, irrational PN rate(22.1% vs 5.5%, P < 0.01) and irrationality monitored compound amino acid injection(18AA-IX)rate(64.0% vs 3.4%, P < 0.01) were decreased. GB group's total medical expenditure(P < 0.05), drug cost ratio(P < 0.01),and drug expenses(P < 0.01) were significantly declined. CONCLUSION Multimodal management significantly enhancedhospital-wide rational use of PN and improved pharmaceutical expenditure patterns in targeted clinical groups.
[1] BERLANA D. Parenteral nutrition overview[J]. Nutrients, 2022,14(21):4480.
[2] BOULLATA J I, MIRTALLO J M, SACKS G S, et al. Parenteral nutrition compatibility and stability:a comprehensive review[J].JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2022, 46(2):273.
[3]国家卫生健康委.国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发第二批国家重点监控合理用药药品目录的通知[EB/OL].(2023-01-13)[2024-10-30]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202301/5b291aaae64b4e56a10f9ea910e11426.shtml.
[4]叶璠,刘瑞珏,陈亚芳.营养专科临床药师参与营养支持治疗会诊的效果分析[J].中国临床药学杂志, 2024, 33(5):344.
[5]宋周烨,肖昌钱,邵燕飞. 1例小肠坏死患者的围术期营养支持与华法林相互作用的药学监护[J].中国现代应用药学, 2021,38(16):2006.
[6]邢鹏,王丽丽,陶丽源,等.三级审核肠外营养处方规则的建立和效果评价[J].肠外与肠内营养, 2024, 31(5):275.
[7]史金平,李薇,梁昕.基于处方前置审核系统的肠外营养审核与点评实践[J].中国药物与临床, 2022, 22(2):114.
[8]任珊,龙玲,赵浩天,等.河北省多家重症医学科医护人员营养治疗认知现状及分析[J].肠外与肠内营养, 2020, 27(5):285.
[9]刘金春,陈大宇,卞晓洁,等.江苏省12家医院肠外营养制剂使用及处方医师肠外营养组方知识掌握情况调查[J].中国基层医药, 2019, 26(13):1616.
[10]广东省药学会.肠外营养临床药学共识(第二版)[J].今日药学,2017, 27(5):289.
[11]赵彬,老东辉,商永光,等.规范肠外营养液配制[J].中华临床营养杂志, 2018, 26(3):136.
[12] AYERS P, ADAMS S, BOULLATA J, et al. A.S.P.E.N. parenteral nutrition safety consensus recommendations[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2014, 38(3):296.
[13] RISKIN A, PICAUD J C, SHAMIR R, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition:Standard versus individualized parenteral nutrition[J]. Clin Nutr, 2018,37(6 Pt B):2409.
[14] GAO S Y, WANG X X, LU Y, et al. Current scenario and challenges of clinical pharmacists to implement pharmaceutical care in DRG/DIP payment hospitals in China:a qualitative interview study[J].Front Public Health, 2024, 12:1339504.
[15]唐景财,朱钊铭,秦柳霄,等.临床药师在DRG背景下参与神经内科药事精细化管理的实践探索[J].中国药事, 2024, 38(5):588.
[16] FIACCADORI E, SABATINO A, BARAZZONI R, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease[J]. Clin Nutr, 2021, 40(4):1644.
[17]许瑞,康万里,郭逸宁,等.从药师角度分析某院肿瘤内科DRG病组亏损的影响因素及应对策略:以RE16病组为例[J].中国药业, 2024, 33(21):14.
[18]柳嘉玮,徐思露,张倩,等. DRG低倍率病例的特征、产生原因与优化建议:以肿瘤专科医院RG13分组为例[J].药学与临床研究, 2023, 31(4):369.
[19]曹文静,张鹏,肖灿,等.全流程药学服务在心血管内科FM35病组患者药品成本管控中的效果分析[J].中国药房, 2024,35(17):2136.
[20]彭珍珍,何薇,罗金瑶,等.我国肠外营养智能化审核监护系统应用的循证评价[J].中南药学, 2024, 22(9):2484.
[21]张静,乔高星,康健,等.肠内肠外营养处方设计系统的开发和应用[J].中国医院药学杂志, 2024, 44(5):598.
[22]倪坚军,吴婷婷,冯珺,等.全肠外营养支持管理软件系统的设计及其临床应用[J].中国药师, 2021, 24(9):1692.
[23]陈菲菲,董曦浩,滕天立,等.未来医院药物管理新模式的探索:数智药学大脑建设与实践经验[J].中国现代应用药学, 2022,39(21):2738.
[24]陈明毅,闫佳佳,唐可京,等.大型公立医院药事管理的精细化实践与探索[J].中国临床药学杂志, 2024, 33(6):408.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2025.03.001
中图分类号:R969.3
引用信息:
[1]宋周烨,叶见青,周子路等.多模态管理对消化道大手术病组肠外营养合理用药的管控效果评价[J].中国临床药学杂志,2025,34(03):161-167.DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2025.03.001.
基金信息:
浙江省药学会医院药学专项科研资助项目(编号2023ZYY27); 国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医院药学高质量发展研究项目(编号NIHAYS2429)