nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, v.35 106-112
上海市某医院COPD急性加重住院患者用药模式及合并心血管疾病对其影响
基金项目(Foundation): 2023年复旦-闵行健康联合体合作项目(编号2023FM06); 2023年度闵行区卫生健康委员会科研课题(编号2023MW57)
邮箱(Email): yangql@fudan.edu.cn;fcw@fudan.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.19577/j.1007-4406.2026.02.002
发布时间: 2026-02-25
出版时间: 2026-02-25
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的 分析2021—2024年上海市某医院慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重(AECOPD)住院患者用药情况及其年度变化趋势,并量化合并心血管疾病(CVD)对特定药物选择的影响。方法 回顾性纳入2021—2024年上海市某医院AECOPD住院患者(n=2 398)的病例资料,收集其人口学特征、临床情况和10类常用药物的处方数据,并基于ICD-10诊断标准将研究对象分为CVD组(n=1 888)与非CVD组(n=510)。分别采用Logistic回归和χ2检验比较2组各类药物与联合用药使用比例差异,Cochran-Armitage趋势检验分析不同年份药物使用比例的变化趋势及合并CVD的影响。结果 纳入患者的年龄为(77.66±8.97)岁,大多数(86.2%)为男性,住院天数为(12.36±8.73)d,近半数(48.3%)因AECOPD累计住院≥2次。与非CVD组相比,CVD组患者年龄更大、女性比例更高及住院天数更长,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。药物使用比例前3位依次为祛痰药(78.9%)、吸入型糖皮质激素(ICS)(70.1%)和甲基黄嘌呤(65.4%),且ICS(OR=1.35, 95%CI:1.09~1.68)和甲基黄嘌呤(OR=1.26, 95%CI:1.03~1.56)在CVD组中使用比例更高。常见用药组合中,CVD组甲基黄嘌呤+ICS(51.1%vs 43.5%)、长效β2受体激动剂+长效抗胆碱能药(LABA+LAMA,40.0%vs 35.5%)及三联疗法(LABA+LAMA+ICS,38.0%vs 32.6%)的使用比例均显著高于非CVD组(P<0.05)。年度变化趋势分析显示,2021—2024年LABA、LAMA、ICS和祛痰药在整体研究对象及CVD组中的使用比例均呈现上升趋势,而甲基黄嘌呤呈下降趋势(P<0.05)。结论 该医院AECOPD住院患者整体用药趋势呈现与慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球创议(GOLD)方向一致的积极变化,然而合并CVD人群对甲基黄嘌呤类药物的持续高使用率与指南警示的心血管风险相悖,建议通过建立CVD合并患者个体化用药路径,健全相关用药监测与评估体系,以及加强多学科协作与临床医师教育优化等途径优化治疗策略。

Abstract:

AIM To analyze medication patterns and annual trends in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(AECOPD) inpatients(2021-2024) in a hospital in Shanghai, and quantify cardiovascular disease(CVD) comorbidity's impact on specific drug selections. METHODS Medical records of AECOPD inpatients(n=2 398)in a hospital in Shanghai were retrospectively included. Demographic characteristics, hospitalization details, and prescription information for 10 commonly used medication categories were collected. Based on the International Classification of Diseases 10 th Revision(ICD-10), patients were categorized into CVD group(n=1 888) and non-CVD group(n=510). Logistic regression and chi-square test were respectively used to compare the differences in the usage proportions of various drugs and combined drugs between 2 groups. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to analyze the changing trends of drug usage proportions in different years and the impact of combined CVD. RESULTS The average age of enrolled patients was(77.66 ± 8.97) years. The majority(86.2%) were male. The average hospital stay was(12.36 ± 8.73) days. Nearly half(48.3%) had been hospitalized more than 2 times due to AECOPD. The CVD group was characterized by the significantly older age, higher proportion of females, and longer hospital stays compared with the non-CVD group, with all differences being statistically significant(P < 0.05). The top three medications by usage rate were mucolytics(78.9%), inhaled corticosteroids(ICS, 70.1%), and methylxanthines(65.4%), while more ICS(OR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.09-1.68) and methylxanthines(OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.03-1.56) were used in the CVD group. Also, combination therapies including methylxanthines+ICS(51.1% vs 43.5%), long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist+long-acting muscarinic antagonist(LABA+LAMA)(40.0% vs 35.5%), and triple therapy(LABA+LAMA+ICS, 38.0% vs 32.6%) were more prevalent in the CVD group(P < 0.05). Annual trends(2021-2024) revealed statistically significant increases in LABA, LAMA, ICS, and mucolytics but a decrease in methylxanthines overall or in the CVD group(P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The overall medication trend of AECOPD inpatients in the hospital has shown a positive change consistent with the direction of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease(COLD). However, for the population with CVD, the continuous high usage rate of methylxanthines is contrary to the cardiovascular risk warnings in the guidelines. It is recommended to optimize the treatment strategy through establishing individualized medication paths for CVD patients, improving the relevant medication monitoring and evaluation system, and strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and clinical doctor education.

参考文献

[1]BLACK-SHINN J L, KINNEY G L, WISE A L, et al.Cardiovascular disease is associated with COPD severity and reduced functional status and quality of life[J]. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 2014, 11(5):546.

[2]DALAL A A, SHAH M, LUNACSEK O, et al. Clinical and economic burden of patients diagnosed with COPD with comorbid cardiovascular disease[J]. Respir Med, 2011, 105(10):1516.

[3]MACDONALD M I, SHAFUDDIN E, KING P T, et al. Cardiac dysfunction during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Lancet Respir Med, 2016, 4(2):138.

[4]BALBIRSINGH V, MOHAMMED A S, TURNER A M, et al.Cardiovascular disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:a narrative review[J]. Thorax, 2022, 77(9):939.

[5]YANG H M, RYU M H, CAREY V J, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations increase the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events:a longitudinal analysis of the copd gene study[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2024, 13(11):e033882.

[6]RUSINOWICZ T, ZIELONKA T M, ZYCINSKA K. Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with exacerbation of COPD[M]//POKORSKI M. Clinical Management of Pulmonary Disorders and Diseases. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2017:53.

[7]Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2024 report[Z/OL].[2025-07-01].https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/#.

[8]MORGAN A D, ZAKERI R, QUINT J K. Defining the relationship between COPD and CVD:what are the implications for clinical practice?[J]. Ther Adv Respir Dis, 2018, 12:1753465817750524.

[9]中华医学会,中华医学会杂志社,中华医学会全科医学分会,等.中国慢性阻塞性肺疾病基层诊疗与管理指南(2024年)[J].中华全科医师杂志, 2024, 23(6):578.

[10]中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组,《慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病诊治管理专家共识》撰写组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病诊治管理专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2022, 45(12):1180.

[11]王亚芬,旷湘楠,尹玉洁,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病的研究进展[J].医学研究生学报, 2022, 35(4):418.

[12]肖甜,陈晓英,王娜,等.中国大城市社区慢性阻塞性肺部疾病患者药物使用现状研究[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(2):142.

[13]魏智民,蔡建芳,崔华,等.北京地区4960例慢性阻塞性肺病住院患者心血管疾病发生率的回顾性调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2011, 32(3):297.

[14]TIAN F, CHEN L, QIAN Z M M, et al. Ranking age-specific modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality:evidence from a population-based longitudinal study[J].EClinicalMedicine, 2023, 64:102230.

[15]白亚蓓,赵印,李秋柯,等. COPD急性加重期患者住院时间和血气分析指标的影响因素[J].中国卫生工程学, 2024, 23(1):86.

[16]MARCUN R, SUSTIC A, BRGULJAN P M, et al. Cardiac biomarkers predict outcome after hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2012, 161(3):156.

[17]LEITNER M, BLUM A M, BALS R. Update zu COPD und kardiovaskulären ereignissen[J]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 2025,150(6):298.

[18]马会华,闫奎坡,闫海峰,等.慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病病理机制研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报, 2025, 27(3):205.

[19]GÜDER G, STÖRK S. COPD and heart failure:differential diagnosis and comorbidity[J]. Herz, 2019, 44(6):502.

[20]CALZETTA L, CAZZOLA M, MATERA M G, et al. Adding a LAMA to ICS/LABA therapy[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(4):758.

[21]CAZZOLA M, CALZETTA L, ROGLIANI P, et al. Triple therapy versus dual bronchodilation and inhaled corticosteroids/long-actingβ-agonists in COPD:accumulating evidence from network metaanalyses[J]. Pulm Ther, 2019, 5(2):117.

[22]ZHAN Z J, MA Y M, HUANG K, et al. Methylxanthine treatment in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China:a real-world study using propensity score matching analysis[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13:802123.

[23]D'ANTONIO S, PENNISI A, CAZZOLA M. Mucolytic therapy in COPD:patient usage and preferences in real-world Italian settings[J]. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 2025, 20:479.

[24]AARON S D. Mucolytics for COPD:negotiating a slippery slope towards proof of efficacy[J]. Eur Respir J, 2017, 50(4):1701465.

[25]PAPI A, AVDEEV S, CALVERLEY P M A, et al. Use of mucolytics in COPD:a Delphi consensus study[J]. Respir Med, 2020, 175:106190.

[26]CHEN Y H, LIU Y, ZHANG J, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes between nebulized and systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of acute exacerbation of COPD in China(CONTAIN study):a post hoc analysis[J]. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 2020, 15:2343.

[27]MACLEOD M, PAPI A, CONTOLI M, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation fundamentals:diagnosis, treatment,prevention and disease impact[J]. Respirology, 2021, 26(6):532.

[28]赵虎雷,谢洋,李建生.慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病的常用评价指标[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2015, 22(5):550.

[29]张文,彭静,陈炬,等.基于多学科协作构建临床用药综合评价体系对重点监控药品合理使用的影响[J].中国药物警戒, 2021,18(12):1166.

[30]徐红冰,张国清,刘皋林.临床药师在一例重症慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重治疗团队中的价值[J].中国临床药学杂志,2012,21(5):311.

[31]李博宇,周梦,翟晓雨,等慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者的药物治疗分析[J].中国临床药理学杂志, 2021, 37(11):1433.

[32]陈美佳,胡玉玲,王为杰,等.频繁急性加重COPD患者吸入药物依从性影响因素的质性研究[J].护理学杂志, 2025, 40(5):37.

[33]LIANG C, MAO X H, NIU H T, et al. Characteristics, management and in-hospital clinical outcomes among inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China:results from the phase I data of ACURE study[J]. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 2021, 16:451.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2026.02.002

中图分类号:R95

引用信息:

[1]白海凡,王春燕,范铭,等.上海市某医院COPD急性加重住院患者用药模式及合并心血管疾病对其影响[J].中国临床药学杂志,2026,35(02):106-112.DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2026.02.002.

基金信息:

2023年复旦-闵行健康联合体合作项目(编号2023FM06); 2023年度闵行区卫生健康委员会科研课题(编号2023MW57)

发布时间:

2026-02-25

出版时间:

2026-02-25

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文