nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2017, 01, v.26 23-27
七氟烷与地氟烷对老年患者罗库溴铵持续输注速率影响的比较
基金项目(Foundation): 浙江省医学会课题(编号2013ZYC-A33)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19577/j.cnki.issn10074406.2017.01.006
投稿时间: 2016-05-07
投稿日期(年): 2016
修回时间: 2016-06-30
终审时间: 2016-09-22
终审日期(年): 2016
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2017-01-25
出版时间: 2017-01-25
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的观察吸入1.3倍最低有效肺泡浓度(MAC)七氟烷和地氟烷麻醉下对老年患者术中罗库溴铵持续输注速率的影响。方法全麻下行择期手术的老年患者60例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级。随机均分为3组,每组20例。3组开始均采用靶控输注丙泊酚(血浆浓度24 mg·L-1)诱导和维持麻醉,静注0.6 mg·kg-1罗库溴铵气管插管。采用TOF-Watch SX肌松监测仪行拇指内收肌肌松监测,待T1恢复5%开始输注罗库溴铵,调节输注速率始终维持T1值8%~10%,稳定5 min时为初始状态。随即七氟烷(S)组和地氟烷(D)组停止输注丙泊酚,分别吸入七氟烷和地氟烷并使呼气末浓度稳定于1.3 MAC,对照(P)组继续输注丙泊酚。记录3组随后罗库溴铵输注速率,停肌松药后Tl恢复至25%所需时间,Tl从25%恢复至75%所需时间(恢复指数)及TOFr(T4/T1)恢复至90%所需时间。结果 3组患者罗库溴铵初始状态输注速率相似,D组和S组输注速率随吸入时间延长而逐渐下降(P<0.05),而P组则未见明显改变;D组和S组初始状态后各时点罗库溴铵输注速率均显著低于P组(P<0.05);D组初始状态后50 min内各时点罗库溴铵输注速率均低于S组(P<0.05),而50~70 min间差异则无统计学意义。与P组比较,D组和S组患者停药后T1恢复至25%时间、T_125%恢复至75%时间和TOFr恢复至90%时间均显著缩短(P<0.05);与S组比较,D组上述肌松恢复时间更短(P<0.05)。结论吸入1.3MAC七氟烷和地氟烷均能显著降低老年患者罗库溴铵持续输注速率,一定时间内地氟烷的该作用强于七氟烷,且肌松恢复更迅速。

Abstract:

AIM To observe the influences of sevoflurane and desflurane on continuous infusion rate of rocuronium in elderly patients. METHODS A total of 60 elderly patients( ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ) undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to 3 groups( group D,S,P) consisting of 20 patients each. At first all the patients adopted the target controlled infusion of propofol( plasma concentration 2-4 μg ·min-1) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia,and accepted intravenous injection of 0. 6 mg·kg-1 rocuronium for intubation. A TOF-Watch SX monitor was used to monitor the neuromuscular function of adductor pollicis muscle. When T1 at 5%,intravenous infusion of rocuronium began and T1 was maintained at 8%-10% all the time. The infusion rate of rocuronium was defined the initial state when T1 at 8%-10% for 5 min. Then the infusion of propofol stopped in sevoflurane group( group S) and desflurane group( group D),sevoflurane and desflurane began to be inhaled respectively and maintained end-tidal concentration at 1. 3 MAC. But there were no changes in the control group( group P). The infusion rate changes of rocuronium were recorded,and the recovery times of muscle relaxant,which including the times of T1 from 0 to 25%,T1 from 25% to 75%( recovery index),TOFr from 0 to 90% were also recorded. RESULTS The initial infusion rate of rocuronium was similar in 3 groups,then gradually decreased in group D and group S when inhaled time prolonged( P < 0. 05),whereas there was no obvious change in the group P. Compared with group P,the recovery times of muscle relaxant,which including the times of T1 from 0 to 25%,T1 from 25% to 75%,TOFr from 0 to 90%,were significantly shortened in group D and group S( P < 0. 05). Compared with group S,the recovery times of muscle relaxant were shorter in group D( P < 0. 05). CONCLUSION The 1. 3 MAC sevoflurane and desflurane can significantly reduce continuous infusion rate of rocuronium in elderly patients. In a certain period of time the effect of desflurane is stronger than sevoflurane,and its muscle relaxant recover is more quick.

参考文献

[1]GIJSENBERGH F,RAMAEL S,HOUWING N,et al.First human exposure of Org25969,a novel agent to reverse the action of rocuronium bromide[J].Anesthesiology,2005,103(4):695.

[2]TERRELL RC.The invention and development of enflurane,isoflurane,sevoflurane,and desflurane[J].Anesthesiology,2008,108(3):531.

[3]MOTAMED C,DONAFI F.Sevoflurane and isoflurane,but not propofol,decrease mivacurium requirements over time[J].Can J Anaesth,2002,49(9):907.

[4]WOLOSZCZUK-GEBICKAB B,WYSKA E,GRABOWSKI T.Sevoflurane increases fade of neuromuscular response to TOF stimulation following rocuronium administration in children.A PK/PD analysis[J].Pediatric Anesthesia,2007,17(7):637.

[5]TURAN G,DINEER E,OZGOHEKM A,et al.Recovery from neuromuscular block following infusion of cisatraeurium using either sevoflurane or propofol for anaesthesia[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2004,21(9):751.

[6]徐钊,郑宏,宣燕.七氟醚与异氟醚对老年患者持续输注顺式阿曲库铵肌松效应的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2011,27(12):1153.

[7]FUCHS-BUDER T,CLAUDIUS C,SKOVGAARD LT,et al.Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agentsⅡ:the Stockholm revision[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2007,51(7):789.

[8]徐光红,张健.吸入不同浓度的七氟醚对罗库溴铵肌松效应的影响[J].安徽医科大学学报,2007,42(3):104.

[9]李友清,郭曲练.地氟醚、异氟醚对罗库溴铵强化作用的时间依赖性研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(1):10.

[10]SALDIEN V,VENNEYEN KM,WUYTS FL.Target-controlled infusion of rocuronium in infants,children,and adults:a comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship[J].Anesth Analg,2003,97(1):44.

[11]STOUT RG,GAN TJ,GLASS PS,et al.The effect of desflurane on rocuronium onset,clinical duration and maintenance requirements[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Belg,2006,57(4):349.

[12]KUMAR N,MIRAKHUR RK,SYMINGRON MJ,et al.Potency and time course of action of rocuronium during desflurane and isoflurane anaesthesia[J].Br J Anaesth,1996,77(4):488.

[13]BOCK M,KLIPPEL K,NITSCHE B,et al.Rocuronium potency and recovery characteristics during steady-state desflurane,sevoflurane,isoflurane or propofol anaesthesia[J].Br J Anaesth,2000,84(1):43.

[14]WOLOSCZUK-GEBIEKA B,LAPCZYNSKI T,WIERZEJSKI W.The influence of halothane,isoflurane and sevoflurane on vecuronium infusion in children[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2001,45(1):73.

[15]MAIDATSI PG,ZARALIDOU AT,GORGIAS NK,et al.Rocuronium duration of action under sevoflurane,desflurane or propofol anaesthesia[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2004,21(10):781.

[16]AMIN AM,MOHAMMAD MY,IBRAHIM MF,et al.Comparative study of neuromuscular blocking and hemodynamic effects of rocuronium and cisatracurium under sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia[J].Middle East J Anaesthesiol,2009,20(1):39.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19577/j.cnki.issn10074406.2017.01.006

中图分类号:R614

引用信息:

[1]康定鑫,饶裕泉,上官王宁,等.七氟烷与地氟烷对老年患者罗库溴铵持续输注速率影响的比较[J].中国临床药学杂志,2017,26(01):23-27.DOI:10.19577/j.cnki.issn10074406.2017.01.006.

基金信息:

浙江省医学会课题(编号2013ZYC-A33)

投稿时间:

2016-05-07

投稿日期(年):

2016

修回时间:

2016-06-30

终审时间:

2016-09-22

终审日期(年):

2016

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2017-01-25

出版时间:

2017-01-25

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文