| 287 | 3 | 76 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 分析医院抗肿瘤药物可疑且非预期严重不良反应(SUSAR)基本情况,为抗肿瘤药物临床试验的安全性监测与管理提供参考。方法 收集2020年11月至2022年5月上报的SUSAR报告,对报告类型、临床试验项目分期、病例人口学特征、药物分类及靶点、SUSAR累及系统-器官、临床表现、严重程度、不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)分级和事件转归等方面进行统计分析。结果 346例次SUSAR报告中,受试者年龄(57.00±11.05)岁,女性(229例次,占66.2%)和乳腺癌患者(89例次,占25.7%)居多。从药物类型来看,绝大多数(326例次,占94.2%)为新型靶向抗肿瘤药物,主要包括小分子靶向药物(166例次,占45.5%)、免疫检查点抑制剂(74例次,占20.3%)、双特异性抗体(35例次,占9.6%)和抗体偶联药物(34例次,占9.3%)等。346例次SUSAR主要累及系统-器官包括消化系统(77例次,占22.3%)、血液系统(42例次,占12.1%)、呼吸系统(40例次,占11.6%)和心血管系统(33例次,占9.5%)等。SUSAR的CTCAE分级主要为3~5级(277例次,占80.1%),严重程度主要为导致住院或延长住院时间(260例次,占75.1%)。结论 该院现开展的临床试验以创新药物为主,发生SUSAR的风险较高;医疗机构应加强临床试验从业人员对SUSAR快速报告标准程序的理解与认识,制定项目安全性监测计划,切实保护临床试验受试者安全。
Abstract:AIM To analyze the suspected and unexpected serious adverse reaction(SUSAR) of antitumor drugs in a hospital, so as to provide reference for the safety monitoring and management of clinical trials of antitumor drugs.METHODS SUSAR reported from November 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The analyse focused on report type, clinical trial stage, demographic characteristics, drug classification and target, systemsorgans involved in SUSAR, clinical manifestations, severity, CTCAE grade and event outcome. RESULTS The age of the subjects in 346 SUSAR reports was 57.00 ± 11.05 years old. The incidence of SUSAR in females(229 patients, 66.2%)was higher than in males. SUSAR mainly occurred in breast cancer subjects(89 patients, 25.7%). In terms of drug types,the majority(326 patients, 94.2%) were novel antitumor drugs, mainly including small-molecule targeted drugs(166patients, 45.5%), immune checkpoint inhibitors(74 patients, 20.3%), bi-specific antibodies(35 patients, 9.6%), antibody conjugate drugs(34 patients, 9.3%), etc. The clinical manifestations of SUSAR involved several systems-organs, including digestive system(77 patients, 22.3%), blood system(42 patients, 12.1%), respiratory system(40 patients, 11.6%), and cardiovascular system(33 patients, 9.5%), etc. The CTCAE grade of SUSAR was mainly grade 3 ~ 5(277 patients, 80.1%).The severity of SUSAR mainly involved hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization(260 patients, 75.1%). CONCLUSION The types of clinical trials conducted in the hospital are mainly innovative drugs, and the risk of SUSAR is high. Medical institutions should enhance the understanding of clinical trial practitioners regarding the standard procedures for promptly reporting of SUSAR and develop safety monitoring plans to effectively safeguard the well-being of clinical trial subjects.
[1]刘敏,裴小静,王海学.我国药物临床试验期间可疑且非预期严重不良反应快速报告的常见问题及建议[J].中国药物警戒,2022,19(2):176.
[2]裴小静,韩玲,王涛.健全药物临床试验期间安全性数据快速报告制度及加强临床试验风险监测管理[J].中国新药杂志, 2019,28(17):2113.
[3]国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心.关于公开征求《药物临床试验期间安全性数据快速报告常见问答(2.0版)》意见的通知[EB/OL].(2022-07-19)[2023-02-13].https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommo n/8bfc89ca5eb5ee205a95e4fdcdb41f28.
[4]国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心.关于发布《药物临床试验期间安全性数据快速报告的标准和程序》的通知[EB/OL].(2018-04-27)[2023-02-13].https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/f86be6d655db5c711fe660bef22c3bf1.
[5]国家药品监督管理局药品评价中心.关于发布《个例安全性报告E2B(R3)区域实施指南》的通知[EB/OL].(2019-11-22)[2023-02-13].https://www.cdr-adr.org.cn/drug_1/zcfg-1/zcfg_zdyz/201911/t20191122_46835.html.
[6]王静.药物临床试验机构中安全性信息报告管理的现状分析[J].今日药学,2021,31(11):870.
[7]王静,杜彪,汪华蓉.2020年版GCP实施后可疑且非预期严重不良反应报告分析[J].中国药业,2021,30(17):12.
[8]朱迎迎,吴剑秋,汤唯艳,等.临床试验中靶向抗肿瘤药物不良反应分析[J].药学与临床研究,2014,22(4):377.
[9]WANG Y C, ZHOU S H,YANG F, et al.Treatment-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in clinical trials:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].JAMA Oncol,2019,5(7):1008.
[10]任晓蕾,詹轶秋,张春燕,等.免疫检查点抑制剂安全性研究及不良反应防治[J].中国药学杂志,2022,57(21):1855.
[11]广东省药学会.免疫检查点抑制剂全程化药学服务指引(2019年版)[J].今日药学,2020,30(5):289.
[12]NISHINO M,RAMAIYA N H,HATABU H,et al.Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade:response evaluation and biomarker development[J].Nat Rev Clin Oncol,2017,14(11):655.
[13]中国医师协会呼吸医师分会,中国医师协会肿瘤多学科诊疗专业委员会.免疫检查点抑制剂相关毒性防治与管理建议[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(24):1811.
[14]汪龙,张莉,程军,等.免疫检查点抑制剂致重症肌无力文献分析[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2017,36(10):624.
[15]中国抗癌协会肿瘤临床化疗专业委员会,中国药学会医院药学专业委员会.抗体偶联药物安全性跨学科管理中国专家共识[J/OL].(2022-12-06)[2023-02-13].http://175.178.72.227/kcms/detail/42.1204.R.20221021.1916.004.html.
[16]中国抗癌协会肿瘤药物临床研究专业委员会,国家抗肿瘤药物临床应用监测专家委员会,国家肿瘤质控中心乳腺癌专家委员会,等.抗体药物偶联物治疗恶性肿瘤临床应用专家共识(2020版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2021,43(1):78.
[17]朱晓芳,王健,王璐璐,等.综合性医院药物临床试验严重不良事件报告的分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(11):163.
[18]王晓敏,粟志英,胡蝶花,等.基于伦理审查的视角对临床试验中非预期严重不良事件的分析[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2019,35(17):1924.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2023.09.001
中图分类号:R979.1
引用信息:
[1]许璇,叶璇,高菲菲,等.我院抗肿瘤药物临床试验可疑且非预期严重不良反应报告分析[J].中国临床药学杂志,2023,32(09):641-646.DOI:10.19577/j.1007-4406.2023.09.001.
基金信息:
上海申康医院发展中心临床三年行动计划资助项目(编号SHDC2020CR3085B);上海申康医院发展中心医企融合创新支撑技能培训专项(编号SHDC2022CRS029); 上海市“医苑新星”青年医学人才培养资助计划-临床药师项目[编号:沪卫人事(2021)99]
2023-09-25
2023-09-25